On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > particularly people who writing network programs. The number of people > who assume that they can get an entire (variable-length) RPC packet by > doing a single read() call astounds me. TCP doesn't provide message > boundaries, never did and never will. The problem is that such program > will work on a LAN, and then blow up when you try using them across the > real Internet. Erm... Not that ignoring the return values was a bright idea, but the lack of reliable ordered datagram protocol in IP family is not a good thing. It can be implemented over TCP, but it's a big overkill. IL is a nice thing to have... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3) H. Peter Anvin
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3) Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3) folkert
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3) Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3) Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3) Jeff Garzik
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(1... David Ford
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Alexander Viro
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Andrew Morton
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Jeff Garzik
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4te... David Ford
- Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(1... H. Peter Anvin