On Saturday 20 January 2018 10:43 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> +     LPSC(26, 0, gpio,        pll1_sysclk2, gpio_clkdev,        0),
> +     LPSC(27, 0, timer0,      pll1_auxclk,  timer0_clkdev,      0),
> +     LPSC(28, 0, timer1,      pll1_auxclk,  NULL,               0),
> +     /* REVISIT: why can't this be disabled? */
> +     LPSC(29, 0, timer2,      pll1_auxclk,  timer2_clkdev,
> +          LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
> +     LPSC(31, 0, arm,         pll1_sysclk1, NULL,
> +          LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),

IMO, in this case the line break makes it more difficult to read so that
checkpatch warning should be ignored.

Thanks
Sekhar

Reply via email to