When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set
to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from
the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped).

Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever
stuck...

Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: acfb3b883f6d ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC 
calls")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 520b0dad3c62..5493bbefbd0d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -62,7 +62,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run 
*run)
 
 static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
+       /*
+        * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is
+        * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a
+        * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
+        *
+        * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
+        * otherwise return to the same address...
+        */
        vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
+       kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
        return 1;
 }
 
-- 
2.14.2

Reply via email to