On 01/26/2018 10:13 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com> writes:After checking all possible call chains to bcma_pmu_resources_init() here, my tool finds that this function is never called in atomic context, namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock. Thus mdelay can be replaced with usleep_range to avoid busy wait. This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com> --- drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c index f1eb4d3..478948c 100644 --- a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void bcma_pmu_resources_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc) * Add some delay; allow resources to come up and settle. * Delay is required for SoC (early init). */ - mdelay(2); + usleep_range(1500, 2000);I would like to have an ack from someone familiar with bcma before I apply this.
No ack for this one. Larry
