Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] printk: Console owner and waiter logic cleanup

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (01/23/18 15:40), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> 
> Why do we even use irq_work for printk_safe?
> 

... perhaps because of

wq: pool->lock -> printk -> call_console_drivers -> printk -> vprintk_safe -> 
wq: pool->lock

Which is a "many things have gone wrong" type of scenario. Maybe we
can workaround it somehow, hm. Tejun, can we have lockless WQ? ;)

        -ss