On Sat, 19 May 2007, Deepak Saxena wrote: > > The Mobile IPv6 package (http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/software/) needs > this header file to build the tunnelctl component. The header > already looks sanitized so is safe to export. > > Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > diff --git a/include/linux/Kbuild b/include/linux/Kbuild > index bcd01f2..e101315 100644 > --- a/include/linux/Kbuild > +++ b/include/linux/Kbuild > @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ unifdef-y += ipc.h > unifdef-y += ipmi.h > unifdef-y += ipv6.h > unifdef-y += ipv6_route.h > +unifdef-y += ip6_tunnel.h > unifdef-y += isdn.h > unifdef-y += isdnif.h > unifdef-y += isdn_divertif.h
is there some understood standard for naming header files related to IPv6? currently, there are header files that start with any one of "ip6_", "ipv6_" and "ip6t_" (although the latter looks like it's specifically for netfilter stuff). is there meant to be a distinction between prefixes of "ipv6_" and "ip6_"? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
