On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 19:30:29 +0100
KarimAllah Ahmed <karah...@amazon.de> wrote:
> ... since INTx is not supported by-spec for virtual functions.
But the spec also states that VFs must implement the interrupt pin
register as read-only zero, so either this is redundant or it's a
workaround for VFs that aren't quite compliant? Thanks,
Alex
>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: KarimAllah Ahmed <karah...@amazon.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jan H. Schönherr <jscho...@amazon.de>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 65099d0..61002fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1232,6 +1232,13 @@ static void pci_read_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> unsigned char irq;
>
> + /* Virtual functions do not have INTx support */
> + if (dev->is_virtfn) {
> + dev->pin = 0;
> + dev->irq = 0;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &irq);
> dev->pin = irq;
> if (irq)
