Hello, On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, T. Camp wrote: > A much cleaner patch prompted after right proper chastisement on the indeed, much cleaner. But still not perfect. > + int root_device_index = 0; this initialisation is not needed. Just make it 'int root_device_index;' The kernel will do the right thing for you on boot, trust me. > +int number_root_devs = 0; this is not needed either. Regards, Tigran - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) T. Camp
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) T. Camp
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) Olivier Galibert
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) T. Camp
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) Jeff Dike
- Re: [PATCH] mutliple root devs (take II) Philipp Rumpf