On Monday 08 January 2018 07:47 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> +void __init da850_pll_clk_init(void __iomem *pll0, void __iomem *pll1)
> +{
> + const struct davinci_pll_divclk_info *info;
> +
> + davinci_pll_clk_register("pll0", "ref_clk", pll0);
I think this will be more readable with empty lines between these
function calls. So here ..
> + davinci_pll_aux_clk_register("pll0_aux_clk", "ref_clk", pll0);
.. here
> + for (info = da850_pll0_divclk_info; info->name; info++)
> + davinci_pll_divclk_register(info, pll0);
> +
> + davinci_pll_clk_register("pll1", "ref_clk", pll1);
.. and here.
> + for (info = da850_pll1_divclk_info; info->name; info++)
> + davinci_pll_divclk_register(info, pll1);
I see that you have included empty line only when changing the PLL, but
I feel its more readable with the additional spacing suggested.
Same comment for other patches too with similar function implemented.
With that minor comment:
Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com>
Thanks,
Sekhar
