On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:47:55AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:49:21PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > > I perfectly agree on that, but this is for stable kernel backports. Because > > of this I want to keep the footprint as low as possible. > > > > When your patchset to clean that up lands for 4.16 I have no problem > > changing that. > > > > But till then I think we should just work on suppress the warning for now. > > Oh well. If Konrad is fine with that I'll stick it in front of my > swiotlb series (the next post is going to be split) with a stable tag, > so everything is well integrated.
Totally. Thanks for taking care of it - been slammed with x86 architecture craziness.
