Hi Markus,

On 2018-01-08 10:43, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 10:21:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The script “checkpatch.pl” pointed information out like the following.

Comparison to NULL could be written …

Thus fix the affected source code places.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/misc/genwqe/card_utils.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/genwqe/card_utils.c b/drivers/misc/genwqe/card_utils.c
index 0b466664c908..84408dc69020 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/genwqe/card_utils.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/genwqe/card_utils.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ int __genwqe_writeq(struct genwqe_dev *cd, u64
byte_offs, u64 val)
        if (cd->err_inject & GENWQE_INJECT_HARDWARE_FAILURE)
                return -EIO;

-       if (cd->mmio == NULL)
+       if (!cd->mmio)
                return -EIO;

        if (pci_channel_offline(pci_dev))
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ u64 __genwqe_readq(struct genwqe_dev *cd, u64 byte_offs)
            (byte_offs == IO_SLC_CFGREG_GFIR))
                return 0x00000000ffff0000ull;

-       if (cd->mmio == NULL)
+       if (!cd->mmio)
                return 0xffffffffffffffffull;

return be64_to_cpu((__force __be64)__raw_readq(cd->mmio + byte_offs));
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ int __genwqe_writel(struct genwqe_dev *cd, u64
byte_offs, u32 val)
        if (cd->err_inject & GENWQE_INJECT_HARDWARE_FAILURE)
                return -EIO;

-       if (cd->mmio == NULL)
+       if (!cd->mmio)
                return -EIO;

        if (pci_channel_offline(pci_dev))
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ u32 __genwqe_readl(struct genwqe_dev *cd, u64 byte_offs)
        if (cd->err_inject & GENWQE_INJECT_HARDWARE_FAILURE)
                return 0xffffffff;

-       if (cd->mmio == NULL)
+       if (!cd->mmio)
                return 0xffffffff;

return be32_to_cpu((__force __be32)__raw_readl(cd->mmio + byte_offs));
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ void *__genwqe_alloc_consistent(struct genwqe_dev
*cd, size_t size,
 void __genwqe_free_consistent(struct genwqe_dev *cd, size_t size,
                             void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle)
 {
-       if (vaddr == NULL)
+       if (!vaddr)
                return;

        dma_free_coherent(&cd->pci_dev->dev, size, vaddr, dma_handle);
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ int genwqe_alloc_sync_sgl(struct genwqe_dev *cd,
struct genwqe_sgl *sgl,

        sgl->sgl = __genwqe_alloc_consistent(cd, sgl->sgl_size,
                                             &sgl->sgl_dma_addr);
-       if (sgl->sgl == NULL) {
+       if (!sgl->sgl) {
                dev_err(&pci_dev->dev,
                        "[%s] err: no memory available!\n", __func__);
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ int genwqe_alloc_sync_sgl(struct genwqe_dev *cd,
struct genwqe_sgl *sgl,
        if ((sgl->fpage_size != 0) && (sgl->fpage_size != PAGE_SIZE)) {
                sgl->fpage = __genwqe_alloc_consistent(cd, PAGE_SIZE,
                                                       &sgl->fpage_dma_addr);
-               if (sgl->fpage == NULL)
+               if (!sgl->fpage)
                        goto err_out;

                /* Sync with user memory */
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ int genwqe_alloc_sync_sgl(struct genwqe_dev *cd,
struct genwqe_sgl *sgl,
        if (sgl->lpage_size != 0) {
                sgl->lpage = __genwqe_alloc_consistent(cd, PAGE_SIZE,
                                                       &sgl->lpage_dma_addr);
-               if (sgl->lpage == NULL)
+               if (!sgl->lpage)
                        goto err_out1;

                /* Sync with user memory */
@@ -406,15 +406,12 @@ int genwqe_setup_sgl(struct genwqe_dev *cd,
struct genwqe_sgl *sgl,
                        /* DMA mapping for requested page, offs, size */
                        size_to_map = min(size, PAGE_SIZE - map_offs);

-                       if ((p == 0) && (sgl->fpage != NULL)) {
+                       if (p == 0 && sgl->fpage)
                                daddr = sgl->fpage_dma_addr + map_offs;
-
-                       } else if ((p == sgl->nr_pages - 1) &&
-                                  (sgl->lpage != NULL)) {
+                       else if ((p == sgl->nr_pages - 1) && sgl->lpage)
                                daddr = sgl->lpage_dma_addr;
-                       } else {
+                       else
                                daddr = dma_list[p] + map_offs;
-                       }

                        size -= size_to_map;
                        map_offs = 0;
@@ -538,7 +535,7 @@ static int genwqe_free_user_pages(struct page **page_list,
        unsigned int i;

        for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
-               if (page_list[i] != NULL) {
+               if (page_list[i]) {
                        if (dirty)
                                set_page_dirty_lock(page_list[i]);
                        put_page(page_list[i]);
@@ -577,7 +574,7 @@ int genwqe_user_vmap(struct genwqe_dev *cd, struct
dma_mapping *m, void *uaddr,
        unsigned long data, offs;
        struct pci_dev *pci_dev = cd->pci_dev;

-       if ((uaddr == NULL) || (size == 0)) {
+       if (!uaddr || size == 0) {
                m->size = 0; /* mark unused and not added */
                return -EINVAL;
        }

I personally like the explicit compare (ptr != NULL) more than the !ptr notation. When was the checkpatch.pl script modified to suggest the latter notation?
Is there any advantage other than the shorter notation?

Regards

Frank

Reply via email to