On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:19 AM, David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Skylake the target for a 'ret' instruction may also come from the
> BTB. So if you ever let the RSB (which remembers where the 'call's came
> from get empty, you end up vulnerable.
That sounds like it could cause mispredicts, but it doesn't sound _exploitable_.
Sure, interrupts in between the call instruction and the 'ret' could
overflow the return stack. And we could migrate to another CPU. And so
apparently SMM clears the return stack too.
... but again, none of them sound even remotely _exploitable_.
Remember: it's not mispredicts that leak information. It's *exploits"
that use forced very specific mispredicts to leak information.
There's a big difference there. And I think patch authors should keep
that difference in mind.
For example, flushing the BTB at kernel entry doesn't mean that later
in-kernel indirect branches don't get predicted, and doesn't even mean
that they don't get mis-predicted. It only means that an exploit can't
pre-populate those things and use them for exploits.
Linus
