On 2018/1/4 4:13, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:33:07PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:27:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Continuing investigation...
After applying the fallback patch to allow new tools to work with older
kernels:
[root@felicio ~]# perf test bpf
39: BPF filter :
39.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
39.2: BPF pinning : Ok
39.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok
39.4: BPF relocation checker : Ok
[root@felicio ~]# uname -a
Linux felicio.ghostprotocols.net 4.13.0-rc7+ #1 SMP Mon Sep 11 13:56:18 -03
2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@felicio ~]# rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.17-157.el7_3.2.x86_64
[root@felicio ~]#
After applying the patch below I get to, which is what I am trying to
fix now:
[root@jouet ~]# perf test bpf
39: BPF filter :
39.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
39.2: BPF pinning : Ok
39.3: BPF prologue generation : FAILED!
39.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip
[root@jouet ~]#
Update the patch to the one at the end of this message to make it work
with older glibcs, so that we ask for epoll_pwait() and hook into that
as well().
Now checking why 39.3 fails...
Couldn't reproduce after fixing up some kernel build problems, the patch
below is all I need to have this working with both Fedora 27 and RHEL7,
please take a look and see if it continues to work on your systems,
It works for me. Thank you.
Since we test epoll_pwait, we'd better correct function names:
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
index 268e5f8..e4123c1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") flip_table = {
.max_entries = 1,
};
-SEC("func=SyS_epoll_wait")
-int bpf_func__SyS_epoll_wait(void *ctx)
+SEC("func=SyS_epoll_pwait")
+int bpf_func__SyS_epoll_pwait(void *ctx)
{
int ind =0;
int *flag = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&flip_table, &ind);
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index 34c22cd..a8f9095 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -19,13 +19,13 @@
#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
-static int epoll_wait_loop(void)
+static int epoll_pwait_loop(void)
{
int i;
/* Should fail NR_ITERS times */
for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++)
- epoll_wait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0);
+ epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
return 0;
}
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static struct {
"[basic_bpf_test]",
"fix 'perf test LLVM' first",
"load bpf object failed",
- &epoll_wait_loop,
+ &epoll_pwait_loop,
(NR_ITERS + 1) / 2,
false,
},
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static struct {
"[bpf_pinning]",
"fix kbuild first",
"check your vmlinux setting?",
- &epoll_wait_loop,
+ &epoll_pwait_loop,
(NR_ITERS + 1) / 2,
true,
},
