On Mon, 14 May 2007 08:56:52 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 14, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang wrote: > >> This patch fixes the following "Section mismatch" warnings when > >> build powerpc platforms. > >> > >> ------------- > >> WARNING: arch/powerpc/mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to > >> .init.text:early_get_page from .text between > >> 'pte_alloc_one_kernel' (at > >> offset 0xc68) and 'pte_alloc_one' > >> WARNING: mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to > >> .init.text:set_up_list3s from .text between > >> 'kmem_cache_create' (at offset > >> 0x20300) and 'cache_reap' > >> ------------- > > This warnings should be handled by __init_refok instead. > Yes, I think so. > > >> Massive warnings represented by: > >> ------------- > >> WARNING: arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o - Section mismatch: > >> reference to > >> .init.data:.got2 from prom_entry (offset 0x0) > >> WARNING: arch/powerpc/platforms/built-in.o - Section mismatch: > >> reference to > >> .init.text:mpc8313_rdb_probe from .machine.desc after > >> 'mach_mpc8313_rdb' > >> (at offset 0x4) > >> ------------- > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I always get confused when a git-tree-owner says "acked-by" against a patch which falls within his tree's area. An acked-by would mean "I'm OK with the patch, please apply it". But I'd have expected to see a "thanks, applied" instead. If it was "Andrew: please merge and send to Linus because it's urgent and I can't be bothered setting up a git pull for it" then fine, but please be explicit about that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
