Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2007, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >>> in short, do *not* remove its "deprecated" status. rather, remove its >>> "obsolete" status and *make* it deprecated. >> it is deprecated and obsolete. > > no, it's not. and, trust me, no one on this list wants me to have to > explain all that again. :-)
So why don't we simply say: - "Users of feature A are urged to migrate to alternative B." - "Feature C will be removed in February 2038." Everybody understands the meaning of /that/. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-= -==-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
