I've hit this twice today. It's odd, because afaics, none of this code
has really changed in a long time.
Dave
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 PID: 6743 Comm: trinity-c117 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc4-think+ #2
RIP: 0010:proc_flush_task+0x8e/0x1b0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000bbffc40 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00000000fffffffb
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffc9000bbffc50 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffc9000bbffc63 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000002
R10: ffffc9000bbffb70 R11: ffffc9000bbffc64 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: ffff8804c10d7840
FS: 00007f7cb8965700(0000) GS:ffff88050a200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000003e21ae003 CR4: 00000000001606e0
DR0: 00007fb1d6c22000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
Call Trace:
? release_task+0xaf/0x680
release_task+0xd2/0x680
? wait_consider_task+0xb82/0xce0
wait_consider_task+0xbe9/0xce0
? do_wait+0xe1/0x330
do_wait+0x151/0x330
kernel_wait4+0x8d/0x150
? task_stopped_code+0x50/0x50
SYSC_wait4+0x95/0xa0
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6c/0x80
? syscall_trace_enter+0x2d7/0x340
? do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
RIP: 0033:0x7f7cb82603aa
RSP: 002b:00007ffd60770bc8 EFLAGS: 00000246
ORIG_RAX: 000000000000003d
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7cb6cd4000 RCX: 00007f7cb82603aa
RDX: 000000000000000b RSI: 00007ffd60770bd0 RDI: 0000000000007cca
RBP: 0000000000007cca R08: 00007f7cb8965700 R09: 00007ffd607c7080
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffd60770bd0 R14: 00007f7cb6cd4058 R15: 00000000cccccccd
Code: c1 e2 04 44 8b 60 30 48 8b 40 38 44 8b 34 11 48 c7 c2 60 3a f5 81 44 89
e1 4c 8b 68 58 e8 4b b4 77 00 89 44 24 14 48 8d 74 24 10 <49> 8b 7d 00 e8 b9 6a
f9 ff 48 85 c0 74 1a 48 89 c7 48 89 44 24
RIP: proc_flush_task+0x8e/0x1b0 RSP: ffffc9000bbffc40
CR2: 0000000000000000
---[ end trace 53d67a6481059862 ]---
All code
========
0: c1 e2 04 shl $0x4,%edx
3: 44 8b 60 30 mov 0x30(%rax),%r12d
7: 48 8b 40 38 mov 0x38(%rax),%rax
b: 44 8b 34 11 mov (%rcx,%rdx,1),%r14d
f: 48 c7 c2 60 3a f5 81 mov $0xffffffff81f53a60,%rdx
16: 44 89 e1 mov %r12d,%ecx
19: 4c 8b 68 58 mov 0x58(%rax),%r13
1d: e8 4b b4 77 00 callq 0x77b46d
22: 89 44 24 14 mov %eax,0x14(%rsp)
26: 48 8d 74 24 10 lea 0x10(%rsp),%rsi
2b:* 49 8b 7d 00 mov 0x0(%r13),%rdi <-- trapping
instruction
2f: e8 b9 6a f9 ff callq 0xfffffffffff96aed
34: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
37: 74 1a je 0x53
39: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
3c: 48 rex.W
3d: 89 .byte 0x89
3e: 44 rex.R
3f: 24 .byte 0x24
Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
0: 49 8b 7d 00 mov 0x0(%r13),%rdi
4: e8 b9 6a f9 ff callq 0xfffffffffff96ac2
9: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
c: 74 1a je 0x28
e: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
11: 48 rex.W
12: 89 .byte 0x89
13: 44 rex.R
14: 24 .byte 0x24
This looks like an inlined part of proc_flush_task_mnt
dentry = d_hash_and_lookup(mnt->mnt_root, &name);
4f99: 48 8d 74 24 10 lea 0x10(%rsp),%rsi
4f9e: 49 8b 7d 00 mov 0x0(%r13),%rdi
4fa2: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4fa7 <proc_flush_task+0x97>
So it looks like this..
3097 for (i = 0; i <= pid->level; i++) {
3098 upid = &pid->numbers[i];
3099 proc_flush_task_mnt(upid->ns->proc_mnt, upid->nr,
3100 tgid->numbers[i].nr);
3101 }
somehow passed a null upid->ns->proc_mnt down there.
I'll try and narrow down a reproducer tomorrow.
Any obvious recent changes that might explain this, or did I just
finally appease the entropy gods enough to find the right combination of
args to hit this ?
Dave
