Hi,
After turning on the debugging for allocations and locks, I
now get a kernel ooops.
[ 5628.608000] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 00000000
[ 5628.608000] printing eip:
[ 5628.608000] c0293210
[ 5628.608000] *pde = 00000000
[ 5628.608000] Oops: 0002 [#1]
[ 5628.608000] Modules linked in: nbd
[ 5628.608000] CPU: 0
[ 5628.608000] EIP: 0060:[<c0293210>] Not tainted VLI
[ 5628.608000] EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.21 #8)
[ 5628.608000] EIP is at tcp_sendmsg+0x726/0xab3
[ 5628.608000] eax: 00000000 ebx: c24576b8 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000
[ 5628.608000] esi: c30a006c edi: 00000840 ebp: 00000000 esp: c3f8fc5c
[ 5628.608000] ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0000 ss: 0068
[ 5628.608000] Process kblockd/0 (pid: 34, ti=c3f8e000 task=c3f89550
task.ti=c3f8e000)
[ 5628.608000] Stack: 00000002 0000012b 00000001 00000046 0000000a c011ad49
00000000 c100dea0
[ 5628.608000] 00000001 00000000 00000000 c2b2c7c0 00000840 000007c0
0000baa8 000005a8
[ 5628.608000] 0000c000 00000000 c3f8fdf8 c3f8e000 00001000 7fffffff
c03a3820 c30a006c
[ 5628.608000] Call Trace:
[ 5628.608000] [<c011ad49>] __do_softirq+0x35/0x73
[ 5628.608000] [<c02ab61c>] inet_sendmsg+0x39/0x43
[ 5628.608000] [<c026c744>] sock_sendmsg+0xbc/0xd4
...
[ 5628.608000] Code: d2 89 d5 74 26 83 be 80 01 00 00 00 0f 85 7b 03 00 00 c7
86 88 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 8b 5c 24 1c 89 9e 80 01 00 00 e9 62 03 00 00 [
5628.608000] EIP: [<c0293210>] tcp_sendmsg+0x726/0xab3 SS:ESP 0068:c3f8fc5c
which seems to be:
0xc02931f1 <tcp_sendmsg+1799>: jne 0xc0293572 <tcp_sendmsg+2696>
0xc02931f7 <tcp_sendmsg+1805>: movl $0x0,0x188(%esi)
0xc0293201 <tcp_sendmsg+1815>: mov 0x1c(%esp),%ebx
0xc0293205 <tcp_sendmsg+1819>: mov %ebx,0x180(%esi)
0xc029320b <tcp_sendmsg+1825>: jmp 0xc0293572 <tcp_sendmsg+2696>
EIP points here:
0xc0293210 <tcp_sendmsg+1830>: cmpl $0x0,0x24(%esp)
0xc0293215 <tcp_sendmsg+1835>: mov 0x98(%ebx),%edx
0xc029321b <tcp_sendmsg+1841>: je 0xc0293232 <tcp_sendmsg+1864>
0xc029321d <tcp_sendmsg+1843>: mov 0x20(%esp),%ecx
0xc0293221 <tcp_sendmsg+1847>: movzwl 0x12(%edx,%ecx,8),%eax
0xc0293226 <tcp_sendmsg+1852>: add %edi,%eax
0xc0293228 <tcp_sendmsg+1854>: mov %ax,0x12(%edx,%ecx,8)
0xc029322d <tcp_sendmsg+1859>: jmp 0xc02932b4 <tcp_sendmsg+1994>
which is
790 if (err) {
791 /* If this page was new, give it to
the
792 * socket so it does not get leaked.
793 */
794 if (!TCP_PAGE(sk)) {
795 TCP_PAGE(sk) = page;
796 TCP_OFF(sk) = 0;
797 }
798 goto do_error;
799 }
800
801 /* Update the skb. */
EIP Points here.....
802 if (merge) {
803 skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i - 1].size
+=
804
copy;
and now the question is: How can the
cmpl $0x0,0x24(%esp)
trap at address 0?
How can "if (merge)" cause a segmentation fault?
If EIP is a bit off, it could be a line erarlier or further. So, could it
crash on the jmp tcp_sendmsg+2696? I dont' thinks so.
How about "mov 0x98(%ebx),%edx"? If ebx is invalid, this should
crash. (ebx apparently holds skb if I understand things correctly).
But from the dump, ebx holds c24576b8, and if that's invalid it would
not say
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
right?
Roger.
--
** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
