On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:01 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote: > >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like > >> v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too. > > > >Then there would be _lots_ of tags in the master tree -- I'm not sure we > >want that. > > > >I suppose I could put a tree on kernel.org which _does_ have the tags, > >and which precisely matches Linus' tree in every other way... but then > >again, you could do that too by just rsyncing the tags yourself :) > > Are you saying GIT tags are expensive, compared to, say, SVN tags?
I wasn't saying that -- I've no idea how expensive SVN tags are. But I was of the opinion that GIT tags aren't free -- I thought I'd seen git-pull explicitly checking (with one round-trip latency) that it has the corresponding commit for every tag it knows about. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
