On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 06:12:27PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Actually, I'm not the author of this workaround. And looking at it > > closer, the current workaround is utterly buggy as it completely inhibit > > CRC error reporting for everything but the listed commands when the MSB > > of the response is a zero. > > > > > > Your name popped up on the commit for this, but as that was during the > bk days the information was severely lacking.
That's not correct. Just as today, it's entirely trackable. We've had the sign-off thing for quite a long time, and we've also had the ARM patch system for ages. That's what the "2271/3" number means. http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=2271%2F1 http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=2271%2F3 First submitted on 22 November 2004 by Nicolas. Went through a couple of revisions until 2271/3 which was committed on 27 November 2004. No indication that the code was done by anyone other than Nicolas, though maybe Nico didn't add appropriate creditation to the real authors. Slap Wrist if we're missing the proper creditation! -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
