On 12/11/2017 06:27 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 12/11/2017 02:19 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> Hi Randy, hi Richard, [ +Hendrik for c895f6f703ad7dd2f ] >> >> On 12/11/2017 09:32 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Randy, >>> >>> Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2017, 03:42:12 CET schrieb Randy Dunlap: >>>> On 12/10/2017 06:08 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>>>> Another week, another rc. >>>> >>>> um (uml) won't build on i386 or x86_64: >>>> >>>> CC init/main.o >>>> In file included from ../include/linux/perf_event.h:18:0, >>>> from ../include/linux/trace_events.h:10, >>>> from ../include/trace/syscall.h:7, >>>> from ../include/linux/syscalls.h:82, >>>> from ../init/main.c:20: >>>> ../include/uapi/linux/bpf_perf_event.h:11:32: fatal error: >>>> asm/bpf_perf_event.h: No such file or directory #include >>>> <asm/bpf_perf_event.h> >>>> ^ >>>> compilation terminated. >>>> ../scripts/Makefile.build:310: recipe for target 'init/main.o' failed >>> >>> How do you trigger that build failure? >>> Can you share your .config? > > Richard, it's just defconfig on both i386 and x86_64. > >> Hmm, too bad kbuild bot doesn't catch issues on uml. I'm not too familiar >> with uml, but looks like it's the only special case where there's no >> arch/um/include/uapi/asm/. What is the usual convention to pull in such >> headers in this case? Something like the below, would that fix it for you? >> >> Thanks for your help, >> Daniel > > Yes, that patch works. Thanks.
Thanks, I'd get it out later today, and route it via bpf tree.
