On 06/12/2017 13:37, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:13:16AM +0800, John Garry wrote:

SNIP

---
 tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c | 215 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 198 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
index a0d489e..a820ed4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
+++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <dirent.h>
 #include <sys/time.h>                    /* getrlimit */
 #include <sys/resource.h>                /* getrlimit */
+#include <sys/queue.h>
 #include <ftw.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
 #include "jsmn.h"
@@ -366,6 +367,94 @@ static int print_events_table_entry(void *data, char 
*name, char *event,
        return 0;
 }

+struct event_struct {
+       char *name;
+       char *event;
+       char *desc;
+       char *long_desc;
+       char *pmu;
+       char *unit;
+       char *perpkg;
+       char *metric_expr;
+       char *metric_name;
+       char *metric_group;
+       LIST_ENTRY(event_struct) list;

is there any reason you don't use the 'struct list_head' ?
I dont think we want another thingie involved for lists

Hi jirka,

The linux kernel headers are not used for jevents tool. I would rather use them if possible...

Thanks,
John


jirka

.



Reply via email to