On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:05:51AM +0000, Dhaval Rajeshbhai Shah wrote: > > Then you need to explain this a lot better, posting a random driver for > > submission that is expected to be used by another one isn't ok. > > Post the whole patch series please, we do not add infrastructure to the > > kernel that is not used right then. > Can I remove the export api and header file and make this driver generic for > the logicoreIP? No other driver will depend on that. This will help us to > remove the isolation between the Programmable system and Programmable logic > by configuring the logicoreIp register set.
I don't know, let's see what that patch submission looks like. If it doesn't do anything, that's not really a good idea :) What's wrong with just submitting your entire driver series? Why break it up like this? That's normally not a good idea, you want us to review it in a "whole" idea, not piece-meal. thanks, greg k-h
