On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 19:29 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 01:53 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:50:36 -0700 > > > > > We discussed this a couple of months back. davem landed firmly in the > > > second camp and everyone then shut up ;) > > > > No I landed in the first :-))) > > > > I think the empty lines are a waste and only serve to eat > > up precious screen real-estate when reading code. > > > > It is possible that I used to use the empty line thing in > > the past, but I definitely don't do that any more. > > Yup, I used to do the other one too but nowadays, I much prefer not > wasting that additional line unless specific circumstances, like I > want a kind of "title" in front of a whole block of other definitions > with their own comments. > > Something like: > > > /* > * foo management stuff > */ > > > /* This puts the bar in the foo > */ > code code code code > > /* This does something you don't want to know about > */ > code code code code
Now your examples are just wrong. One liners should be: /* This puts the bar in the foo */ Are we having fun yet? ;) /me goes to look for something better to do josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
