Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2007 16:52:41 -0700
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Seems to be getting a 0 refcount. I don't see anything in the recent
>> changes which might cause this, but this is relatively new behaviour.
>> It was working for me in the 2.6.21-pre time period, but I haven't tried
>> this since 2.6.21 was released.
>>
>> The BUG is actually triggered by the __module_get(THIS_MODULE) in
>> loop_set_fd.
>>
>> J
>>
>> loop: module loaded
>> device-mapper: ioctl: 4.11.0-ioctl (2006-10-12) initialised: [EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> kernel BUG at /home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/include/linux/module.h:396!
>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
>> PREEMPT SMP
>> Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_mod loop
>> CPU: 1
>> EIP: 0061:[<d085a911>] Not tainted VLI
>> EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.21-paravirt #1339)
>> EIP is at lo_ioctl+0x65/0xa52 [loop]
>> eax: 00000000 ebx: cfb92c98 ecx: d085e480 edx: 00000200
>> esi: 00004c00 edi: cf8ad428 ebp: cf37fdc0 esp: cf37fbf8
>> ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0069
>> Process losetup (pid: 440, ti=cf37e000 task=cf30b4d0 task.ti=cf37e000)
>> Stack: c1390080 c1390080 cf37fc10 00000008 cf8ad428 cfbb2258 00000000
>> cf37fc34
>> c01458c5 cfb92c98 c1392a40 cf30ba70 cf30b4d0 cf30ba54 00000002
>> cf30ba70
>> cf30b4d0 cf30ba54 00000002 00000003 c134c088 c134c088 cf37fc90
>> c01215b8
>> Call Trace:
>> [<c0109173>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
>> [<c0109226>] show_stack_log_lvl+0x9d/0xa5
>> [<c0109425>] show_registers+0x1f7/0x336
>> [<c010967d>] die+0x119/0x21b
>> [<c0382c78>] do_trap+0x8a/0xa4
>> [<c0109ad1>] do_invalid_op+0x88/0x92
>> [<c0382a42>] error_code+0x72/0x78
>> [<c0211c79>] blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x4c/0x5d
>> [<c02123de>] blkdev_ioctl+0x754/0x7a2
>> [<c0198840>] block_ioctl+0x1b/0x1f
>> [<c0182e2e>] do_ioctl+0x22/0x68
>> [<c01830a6>] vfs_ioctl+0x232/0x245
>> [<c0183102>] sys_ioctl+0x49/0x63
>> [<c0108080>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>> =======================
>> Code: ff 83 f8 06 0f 87 5a 09 00 00 ff 24 85 5c bc 85 d0 8b 9b cc 01 00 00
>> b8 80 e4 85 d0 89 9d 5c fe ff ff e8 37 0a 8f ef 85 c0 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe b8
>> 01 00 00 00 e8 79 9f 8c ef e8 ec 4b 9c ef c1 e0
>> EIP: [<d085a911>] lo_ioctl+0x65/0xa52 [loop] SS:ESP 0069:cf37fbf8
>>
>>
>
> A few people have been playing with module refcounting lately. Did you
> work out a reproduce-it recipe?
>
100% reliable, but a bit obscure. I'm booting an FC6 livecd with a
paravirt_ops kernel under Xen. The relevant part of the iso's initrd
script is:
+ mknod /dev/loop118 b 7 118
+ mknod /dev/loop119 b 7 119
+ mknod /dev/loop120 b 7 120
+ mknod /dev/loop121 b 7 121
+ mkdir -p /dev/mapper
+ mknod /dev/mapper/control c 10 63
+ modprobe loop max_loop=128
loop: the max_loop option is obsolete and will be removed in March 2008
loop: module loaded
+ modprobe dm_snapshot
device-mapper: ioctl: 4.11.0-ioctl (2006-10-12) initialised: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ '[' 0 == 1 ']'
+ losetup /dev/loop120 /sysroot/squashfs.img
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at /home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/include/linux/module.h:396!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_mod loop
CPU: 0
EIP: 0061:[<d085a911>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.21-paravirt #1339)
[...]
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
