> So I think it really worth to be separated patch. Really, it's > completely nontrivial why adding new function in lib/find_bit.c > requires including asm-generic/bitops/find.h in arm and uncore32 > asm/bitops.h headers (bug?). And why doing that makes you guard > find_first_bit and find_first_zero_bit (another bug?).
OK, I'll send a separate patch for this. > Linux-next is your choice. > [...] > Again. test_find_next_and_bit is trimmed, but it is still based on > get_cycles and uses tabs in printf(). Please fix it. OK, I'll send a version of the patch rebased against linux-next.
