On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:20 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2007 17:58:55 -0700 > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 May 2007 09:29:12 +0900 > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 08 May 2007 16:37:06 -0400 > > > Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > You probably need a > > > > > configuration with a couple of nodes. Maybesomething less symmetric > > > > > than > > > > > Kame? I.e. have 4GB nodes and then DMA32 takes out a sizeable chunk > > > > > of it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tested on a 2 socket, 4GB Opteron blade. All memory is either DMA32 > > > > or DMA. I added some ad hoc instrumentation to the build_zonelist_* > > > > functions to see what's happening. I have verified that the patches > > > > appear to build the zonelists correctly: > > > > > > > Thank you. good news. > > > > > > > I'm still cowering in fear of these patches, btw. > > > Hmm, the patches looks unclear ? > > > Please keep testing and sending them ;) > > > Okay. but it seems I need other testers... > > I wonder I should drop sysctl of this patch and just support boot option > in next version.
I think the system still need to be able to rebuild the zonelists at run-time in response to memory hotplug [someday, maybe?]. And for now, the sysctl is very useful for testing. And, it does avoid a reboot--quite expensive, timewise, on large platforms--should one find that the default order is not appropriate. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/