On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:53:48 -0600, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Binary patching? If you are binary patching something you need to get >the exact location, one way or another. Whatever tool you use to >extract the location of a symbol in an object file, that same tool >should tell you which section it is in. If the tool only looks in >'.data', it is flawed. The whole point of bss is that it does not have any space allocated in the object on disk. bss is just a section entry saying "this size, at this location", the area is allocated and zeroed at load time. Binary patches against bss on disk cannot work, there is nothing to patch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] removal of &qu... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "st... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static... Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0... Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"... David Hinds
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static... Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "st... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "st... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] removal of &qu... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"... Darryl Miles
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0... Russell King