On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 12:48 -0700, Jim Davis wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Knut Omang <knut.om...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > Would you like to keep the checkpatch changes in some form, or would you > > rather > > see everything happening in the wrapper? > > I don't have a strong preference one way or another, but keeping > everything in a wrapper script might be easier if only because you > wouldn't need to get signoffs from whoever maintains checkpatch too.
Keeping everything in a wrapper script would also allow any arbitrary checker to be run with minimal changes to the Makefile/build subsystem.
