> Thanks to some nice people in #NVIDIA I found what seems to be a > solution; compile with processor type as "K6". No segfaults, lost > terminfo or disabled consoles. > > So are there issues with the K7 processor code? Bleh, never mind, I have > no idea what I am talking about. The K7 optimisations are not used for I/O space accessess. Or shouldnt be, but the nvidia code is unreadable so they may have done so - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved] Petter Sundl�f
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [so... Alan Cox
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes... Petter Sundl�f
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes... Dan Hollis
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 ... J . A . Magallon
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX... Dan Hollis
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-... J . A . Magallon
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 ... Kiril Vidimce
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX... Alan Cox
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-... Kiril Vidimce
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.... Alan Cox
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-... Kiril Vidimce