Andrew Morton wrote: > Whatever happens, that printk should be toned down, shouldn't it? We > prefer to not let unprivileged apps spam the logs.
Only priviledged apps can send these packets. I've never seen it in practice except for one case that was a bug in the network stack, so I'd prefer to keep it. The original intention was to give the user a hint why these packets are not affected by iptables rules, so a more descriptive message would make sense. I'll queue a patch for this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
