3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Hannu Lounento <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit 76ed5a8f47476e4984cc8c0c1bc4cee62650f7fd ] Fix an if statement with hw_dbg lines where the logic was inverted with regards to the corresponding return value used in the if statement. Signed-off-by: Hannu Lounento <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <[email protected]> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c @@ -699,9 +699,9 @@ static s32 igb_update_flash_i210(struct ret_val = igb_pool_flash_update_done_i210(hw); if (ret_val) - hw_dbg("Flash update complete\n"); - else hw_dbg("Flash update time out\n"); + else + hw_dbg("Flash update complete\n"); out: return ret_val;
