On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:58:14PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Because you want to be able to `kill <pid>`?
> > And if you are over-limits you can't?
> Wrong. limit is a shell built in
I assume you mean kill is a shell builtin. Depending on your shell. :-).
It's still a real pain when you want to get the pid of the offending
proces(ses). You could of course do something like
for a in /proc/*; do echo -en "$a "; cat $a/cmdline; echo; done (it'll
barf a lot, but give a reasonable picture)...
Anyways, this is all not relevant, imho the whole point is moot.
"I don't like root having rlimits."
"So don't setrlimit root."
No reason to ditch functionality.
--
Frank v Waveren
fvw@[var.cx|stack.nl|chello.nl|dse.nl]
ICQ# 10074100
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Jan Rekorajski
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, plea... Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, ... Jan Rekorajski
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, ... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Andreas Dilger
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Jan Rekorajski
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, plea... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, ... Frank v Waveren
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for ro... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Jan Rekorajski

