> This replaces the custom license information text with the appropriate > SPDX identifier. While the information here stays the same, it is easier > to read. > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <mart...@posteo.de> > Acked-by: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pme...@pmeerw.net> Acked-by: Harinath Nampally <harinath...@gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Philippe Ombredanne <pombreda...@nexb.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Jonathan Cameron <ji...@kernel.org> wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 10:10:11 +0100 >> Martin Kepplinger <mart...@posteo.de> wrote: >> >>> This replaces the custom license information text with the appropriate >>> SPDX identifier. While the information here stays the same, it is easier >>> to read. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <mart...@posteo.de> >>> Acked-by: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pme...@pmeerw.net> >> >> I'm not 100% sure the intent of the SPDX work is to remove >> existing licence text. So far the big sets have only been >> adding tags to files missing their licenses entirely... >> >> Anyone found any specific guidance on this? > > Jonathan: > you might want to check the doc patches from tglx [1] as well as > several related patches from greg k-h such as these [2] and his > initial pull [3] > > To get a lot of details you can check all the recent SPDX-related posts too > [4] > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151051532322831&w=2 > [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151068111802610&w=2 > [3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150963579219623&w=2 > [4] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&w=2&r=1&s=spdx&q=b > -- > Cordially > Philippe Ombredanne
