Den 11/12/2017 11:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 11/9/2017 11:55, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux
distribution:
Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
An Available Source Operating System.
Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in
operation. Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short
buffers, lowest latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU,
max cpu utilization.
Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct
attitude.
Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have
yet, but how does it sound?
Peace,
Ywe Cærlyn.
I have made a good logo
aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png
I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect:
Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for
instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a
finely granulated internet economy.
A test channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
Peace,
Ywe Cærlyn.
With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics
comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it
back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open
source", and "free software" to "Available Source". It is
repeated a lot, and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not
speak of avoiding uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ).
This is also based on on my conclusion on philosophy research
over 15 years, and that things need to be right. And even
metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard Stallman on this,
maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The hacker will
now not only be free, but make money. ;)
Peace.
Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he
did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
|
|[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please
consider ]]]
|[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all
enemies, ]]]
|[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's
example. ]]]|
|
|It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux. If you call
|it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
|none of the credit. Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
|give us equal mention.
|
|See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
|https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
|https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
|
|--
|Dr Richard Stallman
|President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
|Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
|Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
|
And-
|
|[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please
consider ]]]
|[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all
enemies, ]]]
|[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's
example. ]]]
|
|"Available source" is too weak a criterion. Free software and open
|source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
|However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
|include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
|
|Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
|freedom. "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
|so it would not communicate what we want to say.
|
|
|--
|Dr Richard Stallman
|President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
|Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
|Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
|
Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this
self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue
of finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed
succeed if it chokes its own success?
To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains
shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier
and god, he slaves to.
Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard
Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the
decision?
How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to
PC C, and the original unix hacking?
Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am
going to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.
For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected
phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and
parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A
further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution
with similar sound of input and output.
Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.
I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the
principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.
Peace.
No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to
BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this.
Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution
independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying
video or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games,
desktop etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And
minimal jitter programming.
So bye for now.
Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also.
So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of
OpenBSD seems to be more like me.
Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and
if GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented
that at all, and is an enemy of this.
So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same.
"Unnud Oddox be with you".
It seems clear now, that the often criticised behaviour problems of
"GNU-Zealots" is due to the "GNU is not Unix" type ripping mentality
of Stallman. Ripping Unix was ofcourse illegal in its time. That is
ofcourse corrected with OpenBSD, a legal fork of Unix, and instead the
three clause BSD licence, which is without all the criticisms of GNU,
"Tivoization", and supposedly "legal" knowledge.
I have now included a "no GNU-Zealots" type logo, which also can be
obtained from me, if wanted:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
And ofcourse on a larger scale, part of a better internet, an
Ultranet, a superweb, with clean news, and social netactivity.
Peaceful Saluations.
Btw, Stallmans own "LIbre"-tweak seems to be going in the same
direction. However as long as GNU really is based on an illegal rip of
Unix, where he is the frontman, a complete correction is really going to
a legal fork of Unix, like OpenBSD. Or it still really is just as dodgy
as Microsofts MS-DOS rip.
My about page is now up on ultranet. http://www.ultranet.life/author-info/
