On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 11:47 -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > I've applied patch-2.6.21-rt1 to a 2.6.21 kernel I'm using. > With the patch applied, but no RT-Preempt options enabled, > I'm getting network failures (eth0 transmit timeouts) on > an OMAP board.
Are you sure you don't have HardIRQS in Threads enabled? Also are you sure the kernel boots without the rt patch applied. > I'm not sure what the best method is to debug this. Should > I turn on the latency tracer? Should I post my configuration? > Should I try to break up the patch and apply changes in small doses? > I'm not familiar with the network code, or with the RT code (yet), > so for now I'm kind of stumbling in the dark. > > Note that I have other patches applied, for platform support > for the OMAP. > > I believe ARM (or OMAP) is not supported by the RT-preempt patch > at the moment. But I'd like to carry the patches in my kernel even > if the options for RT-preempt are off, because I want to experiment > with RT-preempt on other platforms (x86 and MIPS). ARM is supported, but specific boards are hit or miss.. I've had OMAP working _in the past_ with this patch applied, http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/10/59 There was also a patch released on one of the OMAP lists a while back from Dirk Behme to get OMAP working on a mor recent rt release.. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
