On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:31:15PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:16:43AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > This semaphore approach is broken due to the LE process using an anon inode > > for > > /dev/sgx, which results in sgx_release being called without an accompanying > > call > > to sgx_open. This causes deadlocks due to a semaphore underrun. > > > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/intel-sgx-kernel-dev/2017-November/000901.html > > Thank you for catching this. I can only say that I forgot to fix it it > for v5. It will be refined for v6. > > /Jarkko
I added a fix to 'le' branch (will be squashed in v6). /Jarkko
