On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 07:48:18PM +0300, Vitaly Lipatov wrote:
> for fcntl64 with F_GETLK64 we need use checking against COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX.
> 
> Fixes: 94073ad77fff2 "fs/locks: don't mess with the address limit in 
> compat_fcntl64"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Lipatov <l...@etersoft.ru>
> ---
>  fs/fcntl.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
> index 30f47d0..e9443d9 100644
> --- a/fs/fcntl.c
> +++ b/fs/fcntl.c
> @@ -590,17 +590,17 @@ convert_fcntl_cmd(unsigned int cmd)
>   * GETLK was successful and we need to return the data, but it needs to fit 
> in
>   * the compat structure.
>   * l_start shouldn't be too big, unless the original start + end is greater 
> than

I assume that should be start + end.

> - * COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX, in which case the app was asking for trouble, so we 
> return
> + * off_t_max, in which case the app was asking for trouble, so we return
>   * -EOVERFLOW in that case.

It took me a minute to understand.  OK, I get it, the application's not
supposed to issue a GETLK with offset+len too large, so of course it
shouldn't encounter a conflicting lock out there.

I don't think that's true, though, thanks to the special interpretation
of length 0 in the argument; it looks to me like we can find a conflict
with a lock that starts beyond COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX in that case.

I guess that's independent of your patch, though.

--b.

> l_len could be too big, in which case we just
>   * truncate it, and only allow the app to see that part of the conflicting 
> lock
>   * that might make sense to it anyway
>   */
> -static int fixup_compat_flock(struct flock *flock)
> +static int fixup_compat_flock(struct flock *flock, loff_t off_t_max)
>  {
> -     if (flock->l_start > COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX)
> +     if (flock->l_start > off_t_max)
>               return -EOVERFLOW;
> -     if (flock->l_len > COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX)
> -             flock->l_len = COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX;
> +     if (flock->l_len > off_t_max)
> +             flock->l_len = off_t_max;
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(fcntl64, unsigned int, fd, 
> unsigned int, cmd,
>               err = fcntl_getlk(f.file, convert_fcntl_cmd(cmd), &flock);
>               if (err)
>                       break;
> -             err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock);
> +             err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock, COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX);
>               if (err)
>                       return err;
>               err = put_compat_flock(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));
> @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(fcntl64, unsigned int, fd, 
> unsigned int, cmd,
>               err = fcntl_getlk(f.file, convert_fcntl_cmd(cmd), &flock);
>               if (err)
>                       break;
> -             err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock);
> +             err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock, COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX);
>               if (err)
>                       return err;
>               err = put_compat_flock64(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));
> -- 
> 2.10.4

Reply via email to