On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 03:02 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
> mind. I can't help
> wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
> why don't you
> just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch
> of
> great work, proving beyond any reasonable doubt that he is capable of
> maintaining
> this subsystem, whatever algorithm is finally adopted? Are you worried that
> Con
> might steal your thunder? That somehow the scheduler is yours alone? That
> you
> might be perceived as less of a genius if somebody else gets credit
> for their good
> work? NIH?
>
> My perception is that you barged in to take over just when Con got things
> moving
> after the scheduler sat and rotted for several years. If that is in
> any way accurate,
> then shame on you.
Nice flame bait. There's a hell of a lot I could say about this, but
I'll just leave it.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
