On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, James Hogan wrote: > > I looked this over pretty carefully and it looks correct to me. It > > makes no difference > > in the instructions generated by the non-EVA case. I shouldn't have > > missed this :(. > > > > Reviewed-by: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com> > > Yeh, having stared at it for a little while it looks correct to me too. > > Reviewed-by: James Hogan <jho...@kernel.org>
How about getting rid of the `noreorder' mode and the manually scheduled delay slot here altogether though, as I outlined? Maciej
