On 2017-11-11 17:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Fix child-node lookup during probe, which ended up searching the whole
> device tree depth-first starting at parent rather than just matching on
> its children.
> 
> Later sanity checks on node properties (which would likely be missing)
> should prevent this from causing much trouble however, especially as the
> original premature free of the parent node has already been fixed
> separately (but that "fix" was apparently never backported to stable).
> 
> Fixes: e7ec014a47e4 ("Input: twl6040-vibra - update for device tree support")
> Fixes: c52c545ead97 ("Input: twl6040-vibra - fix DT node memory management")
> Cc: stable <sta...@vger.kernel.org>     # 3.6
> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com>
> Cc: H. Nikolaus Schaller <h...@goldelico.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jo...@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com>

> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c 
> b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> index 5690eb7ff954..15e0d352c4cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> @@ -248,8 +248,7 @@ static int twl6040_vibra_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       int vddvibr_uV = 0;
>       int error;
>  
> -     of_node_get(twl6040_core_dev->of_node);
> -     twl6040_core_node = of_find_node_by_name(twl6040_core_dev->of_node,
> +     twl6040_core_node = of_get_child_by_name(twl6040_core_dev->of_node,
>                                                "vibra");
>       if (!twl6040_core_node) {
>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "parent of node is missing?\n");
> 

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Reply via email to