On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 08:42:50AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Sat, 5 May 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > > NOTE: This patch is for conceptual review. I'd appreciate any feedback > > > especially on the locking approach taken here. It will be critical to > > > resolve the locking issue for this approach to become feasable. > > > > Do you have any numbers on how this improves dcache reclaim under memory > > pressure? > > How does one measure something like that?
You could measure how many dentries are flushed before an > order 1 allocation is satisfied? Make sure to fill the dcache first. There are no counters there for this, but that should be reasonably easy to add. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
