In our production, we have observed that the job loader gets stuck for
10s of seconds while doing mount operation. It turns out that it was
stuck in register_shrinker() and some unrelated job was under memory
pressure and spending time in shrink_slab(). Our machines have a lot
of shrinkers registered and jobs under memory pressure has to traverse
all of those memcg-aware shrinkers and do affect unrelated jobs which
want to register their own shrinkers.

This patch has made the shrinker_list traversal lockless and shrinker
register remain fast. For the shrinker unregister, atomic counter
has been introduced to avoid synchronize_rcu() call. The fields of
struct shrinker has been rearraged to make sure that the size does
not increase.

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/shrinker.h |  4 +++-
 mm/vmscan.c              | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 388ff2936a87..434b76ef9367 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -60,14 +60,16 @@ struct shrinker {
        unsigned long (*scan_objects)(struct shrinker *,
                                      struct shrink_control *sc);
 
+       unsigned int flags;
        int seeks;      /* seeks to recreate an obj */
        long batch;     /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
-       unsigned long flags;
 
        /* These are for internal use */
        struct list_head list;
        /* objs pending delete, per node */
        atomic_long_t *nr_deferred;
+       /* Number of active do_shrink_slab calls to this shrinker */
+       atomic_t nr_active;
 };
 #define DEFAULT_SEEKS 2 /* A good number if you don't know better. */
 
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index eb2f0315b8c0..f58c0d973bc4 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ int vm_swappiness = 60;
 unsigned long vm_total_pages;
 
 static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
-static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(shrinker_lock);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
@@ -285,21 +285,40 @@ int register_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
        if (!shrinker->nr_deferred)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
-       down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-       list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
-       up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+       atomic_set(&shrinker->nr_active, 0);
+       spin_lock(&shrinker_lock);
+       list_add_tail_rcu(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
+       spin_unlock(&shrinker_lock);
        return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_shrinker);
 
+static void get_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+       atomic_inc(&shrinker->nr_active);
+}
+
+static void put_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+       if (!atomic_dec_return(&shrinker->nr_active))
+               wake_up_atomic_t(&shrinker->nr_active);
+}
+
+static int shrinker_wait_atomic_t(atomic_t *p)
+{
+       schedule();
+       return 0;
+}
 /*
  * Remove one
  */
 void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
-       down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-       list_del(&shrinker->list);
-       up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+       spin_lock(&shrinker_lock);
+       list_del_rcu(&shrinker->list);
+       spin_unlock(&shrinker_lock);
+       wait_on_atomic_t(&shrinker->nr_active, shrinker_wait_atomic_t,
+                        TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
        kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_shrinker);
@@ -404,7 +423,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control 
*shrinkctl,
                total_scan -= shrinkctl->nr_scanned;
                scanned += shrinkctl->nr_scanned;
 
-               cond_resched();
+               cond_resched_rcu();
        }
 
        if (next_deferred >= scanned)
@@ -468,18 +487,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
        if (nr_scanned == 0)
                nr_scanned = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
 
-       if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
-               /*
-                * If we would return 0, our callers would understand that we
-                * have nothing else to shrink and give up trying. By returning
-                * 1 we keep it going and assume we'll be able to shrink next
-                * time.
-                */
-               freed = 1;
-               goto out;
-       }
+       rcu_read_lock();
 
-       list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
+       list_for_each_entry_rcu(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
                struct shrink_control sc = {
                        .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
                        .nid = nid,
@@ -498,11 +508,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
                if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
                        sc.nid = 0;
 
+               get_shrinker(shrinker);
                freed += do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, nr_scanned, nr_eligible);
+               put_shrinker(shrinker);
        }
 
-       up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
-out:
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+
        cond_resched();
        return freed;
 }
-- 
2.15.0.403.gc27cc4dac6-goog

Reply via email to