On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:10:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: SNIP
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected] > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> > > --- > > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 7 ++++--- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c > > index 2516e53104be..530961a343fc 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c > > @@ -1082,6 +1082,7 @@ static void annotate__branch_printf(struct > > block_range *br, u64 addr) > > } > > } > > > > +#define ADDR_LEN 10 > > This doesn't align kernel addresses well, as they will take more > columns, so I'm trying the patch below, on top of yours, ok? > > I will combine both to elliminate unnecessary churn, ok? argh.. sounds good, thanks jirka
