On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:36:25AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > How about complete_nodep() as name? Otherwise this looks ok to me - not > pretty, but not _that_ horrible either..
I read that as node-p, not no-dep. complete_nocheck()?
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:36:25AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > How about complete_nodep() as name? Otherwise this looks ok to me - not > pretty, but not _that_ horrible either..
I read that as node-p, not no-dep. complete_nocheck()?