* Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> [171103 17:34]:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:00:12 -0700 Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks like I'm still carrying patch "mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE
> > isolation in has_unmovable_pages" from Michal [1] for commit e1d753dff0fa
> > ("mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages") and Linux next
> > has been broken for CMA for few weeks now as noted in the discussion
> > also at [1].
> >
> > What's the status of this regression? How come it's been known
> > broken for two weeks and still not fixed or reverted in next?
> > This is clearly is not suitable for "wider testing" ;)
>
> Travel to Europe and subsequent bustage in the -next tree held things
> up. Today's merge looks good so I expect to get this into Stephen
> today.
OK thanks for the update.
> In future, please feel free to send such hot fixes to Stephen.
Sure.
Tony
