On 11/03/17 17:10 +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 11/03/2017 04:51 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On 11/03/17 14:54 +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/03/2017 01:53 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > > Some reserved pages, such as those from NVDIMM DAX devices, are
> > > > not for MMIO, and can be mapped with cached memory type for better
> > > > performance. However, the above check misconceives those pages as
> > > > MMIO. Because KVM maps MMIO pages with UC memory type, the
> > > > performance of guest accesses to those pages would be harmed.
> > > > Therefore, we check the host memory type by lookup_memtype() in
> > > > addition and only treat UC/UC- pages as MMIO.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
> > > > Reported-by: Cuevas Escareno, Ivan D <ivan.d.cuevas.escar...@intel.com>
> > > > Reported-by: Kumar, Karthik <karthik.ku...@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > index 0b481cc9c725..e9ed0e666a83 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > @@ -2708,7 +2708,24 @@ static bool mmu_need_write_protect(struct
> > > > kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
> > > > static bool kvm_is_mmio_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> > > > {
> > > > if (pfn_valid(pfn))
> > > > - return !is_zero_pfn(pfn) &&
> > > > PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> > > > + return !is_zero_pfn(pfn) &&
> > > > PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)) &&
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Some reserved pages, such as those from
> > > > + * NVDIMM DAX devices, are not for MMIO, and
> > > > + * can be mapped with cached memory type for
> > > > + * better performance. However, the above
> > > > + * check misconceives those pages as MMIO.
> > > > + * Because KVM maps MMIO pages with UC memory
> > > > + * type, the performance of guest accesses to
> > > > + * those pages would be harmed. Therefore, we
> > > > + * check the host memory type in addition and
> > > > + * only treat UC/UC- pages as MMIO.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * pat_pfn_is_uc() works only when PAT is
> > > > enabled,
> > > > + * so check pat_enabled() as well.
> > > > + */
> > > > + (!pat_enabled() ||
> > > > + pat_pfn_is_uc(kvm_pfn_t_to_pfn_t(pfn)));
> > >
> > > Can it be compiled if !CONFIG_PAT?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > What I check via pat_enabled() is not only whether PAT support is
> > compiled, but also whether PAT is enabled at runtime.
>
> The issue is about pat_pfn_is_uc() which is implemented only if CONFIG_PAT is
> enabled, but you used it here unconditionally.
>
> I am not sure if gcc is smart enough to omit pat_pfn_is_uc() completely under
> this case. If you really have done the test to compile kernel and KVM module
> with CONFIG_PAT disabled, it is fine.
>
I've done the test and it can compile.
arch/x86/mm/Makefile shows pat.c is compiled regardless of CONFIG_X86_PAT,
and pat_pfn_is_uc() is defined out of #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAT ... #endif.
Haozhong
