Sounds good. Thanks for the context. I'll keep this on my plate and I'll turn something around once I've had a chance to test a bit, probably next week.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Craig Bergstrom <cra...@google.com> wrote: > >> Reverting seems like the right approach at the moment. My apologies >> for the breakage so late the in the cycle. > > Note that there's no need for you to apologize and you carry exactly zero > amount > of blame for the late-cycle breakage: it was my decision to send it to Linus > so > quickly, you never asked for it to be sent upstream on such a short notice. > > ( Classic "patch makes sense, looks good, other arches ar doing this too, and > I > tested it myself too on multiple systems, so it must be obviously fine for > everyone" moment. ) > > Your change still makes sense from a robustness POV, so please send it again > with > the suggested fixes - and I'll be more careful with the upstream merge this > time. > > Thanks, > > Ingo
