On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:54 PM, James Morris <james.l.mor...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >> I'm *very* unhappy with the security layer as is > > > > What are you unhappy with? > > We had two big _fundamental_ problems this merge window: > > - untested code that clearly didn't do what it claimed it did, and > which caused me to not even accept the main pull request > > - apparmor code that had a regression, where it took three weeks for > that regression to be escalated to me simply because the developer was > denying the regression. > > Tell me why I *shouldn't* be unhappy with the security layer? > > I shouldn't be in the situation where I start reviewing the code and > go "that can't be right". > > And I *definitely* shouldn't be in the situation where I need to come > in three weeks later and tell people what a regression is!
Agreed on both counts, and sorry for these problems. -- James Morris <james.l.mor...@oracle.com>
