Hello, On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:55:00PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > I remember that softirq can be invoked when irq_eixt(), > and in this case the current->current_pwq is also NULL > if __queue_work() is called in the soft irq. > > So in_task() might be better than !in_irq() for the fix?
Reverted the patch for now. Li, what do you think? Thanks. -- tejun
