On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Julia, > > > 2017-10-15 18:55 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>: > > Make coccicheck checked for the existence of DEBUG_FILE on each semantic > > patch, and bailed if it already existed. This meant that DEBUG_FILE was > > useless for checking more than one semantic patch at a time. Now the check > > is moved to the start of make coccicheck, and the 2> is changed to a 2>> to > > append to the file on each semantic patch. Furthermore, the spatch command > > that is run for each semantic patch is also added to the DEBUG_FILE, to > > make clear what each stdout trace corresponds to. > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> > > > > I think this is a good improvement, > and looks almost good to me. > > Just one nit. > > > > > > } > > > > +if [ "$DEBUG_FILE" != "/dev/null" -a "$DEBUG_FILE" != "" ]; then > > + if [ -f $DEBUG_FILE ]; then > > + echo "Debug file $DEBUG_FILE exists, bailing" > > + exit > > + fi > > + touch $DEBUG_FILE > > I think this "touch" is redundant. > > If the DEBUG_FILE does not exist, 2>> will automatically create it. Thanks very much for the feedback. I will resubmit. julia > > > > > > +else > > + DEBUG_FILE="/dev/null" > > +fi > > + > > if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then > > for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | > > sort`; do > > coccinelle $f > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada >
